The IMRaD format

IMRaD is an acronym for Introduction – Method – Results – and – Discussion.

The IMRaD format is a way of structuring a scientific article. It is often used in healthcare and the natural sciences. Unlike theses in the social sciences, the IMRaD format does not include a separate theory chapter.

Theses structured using the IMRaD format are usually short and concise. The language will be as plain and as unambiguous as possible. There is no place in this type of writing for personal views and fanciful language.

Introduction

Use the introduction to show that you are knowledgeable about your field of study and existing research. Your introduction should contain:

  • A summary of existing research on the subject
  • Your research question, hypothesis or thesis statement
  • Theory (if relevant)
  • An introduction to the field, the current situation, or prevailing practice

The introduction should explain what we know, and what we are uncertain about. It should explain and summarise, but it should also ask questions, clarify, compare, and so on. Everything you write here must relate to your research question.

Method

Use your method chapter to show that you arrived at your results by applying valid and reliable methods. Explain what you did: your research, treatment, or professional intervention, and how you did it.

  • Account for what you did and did not do
  • Document what you did and did not do

Your method chapter shows how you arrived at your results

Results

A relatively large part of your paper/thesis should be devoted to your results (findings, data, empirical evidence). In this section you should:

  • Present the findings 
    Organise, classify, analyse and (if relevant) categorise
  • Explain and interpret (e.g. differences between various studies)
  • Assess and evaluate

Your results = the essence of your paper.

The Introduction and Methods chapters should build up to your Results chapter by showing the significance of your results (in the Introduction chapter) and how you arrived at your results (in the Methods chapter).

Discussion

In this chapter, you discuss the results of your study/project.

  • Is it possible to generalise?
  • Make comparisons with other studies
  • Are there alternative explanations?
  • What are the strong and weak aspects of your study?
  • What are the practical implications?
  • Is more research needed?
  • Make recommendations (to be applied in practice).

For your conclusion

What answer(s) have you found to your research question? If you have a hypothesis, has it been strengthened, weakened or falisified? Do not introduce issues here that have not been mentioned earlier. If the results of your study do not allow you to draw any conclusions, you can end by summing up.

Articles based on the IMRaD format can be found in Helsebiblioteketopen in new window. For more reading about the IMRAD format, try searching in Oriaopen in new window.

Last Updated:

Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
University of Bergen
University of Bergen
University of Oslo
University of Oslo